Fee or Free
[ Contents | Search | Post ]
CONTENTS
Note: you may need to reload this page to see the most recent additions.
- Does case data on the Internet reduce litigant
privacy JCIT 2/21/98
- Whatever's publicly filed is public
Joe Edwards 2/21/98
- Re: Whatever's publicly filed is public
Lewis Kinard 7/7/98
- fee or free PKratka@Aol.com 4/17/99
- Litigant who uses court system at public
expense gives up a portion of their privacy
David Poole 2/21/98
- Information is available on Lexis-Nexis anyway
Jim Johnson 2/21/98
- Information is already public record and
anyone could pick up the phone and obtain it
from the court. Patrick Mulry 2/21/98
- Only searchable and queryable information is
of any real use Patrick Mulry
2/21/98
- Info is public anyway. If privacy were the
real concern, means wouldn't matter.
Craig Ball 2/21/98
- It's public material. Making it available on
the internet merely makes it easily accessible
R. K. (Kris) Weaver 2/22/98
- "Case data" is not a live camera or
microphone capturing privileged communications.
Stewart Ransom Miller 2/22/98
- What's the big deal? Michael Jung
2/27/98
- Making information available in civil cases
furthers the very words freedom of information,
Michael G Tacher 2/27/98
- Regardless of whether it will reduce the
privacy of litigants, it will be reducing
privacy to which there is no right
David A. Schulman 2/27/98
- Should the State recover costs for Open
Records information requests JCIT 2/21/98
- You don't have to pay a policeman to answer a
question, why pay to look up court information
Jim Johnson 2/21/98
- Recovered costs should be ACTUAL costs
Jim Johnson 2/21/98
- Raise filing fees and don't charge for access.
Patrick Mulry 2/21/98
- Must have a provision for a waiver or
reduction of fee for good cause shown
Craig Ball 2/21/98
- Even if the waiver was mandatory for some
groups like
non-profits, how do you keep the individual from being discriminated against
Walt Borges -- TCA
Court Watch director 2/26/98
- Recover costs policy offends me
Martin L. Kahn 2/21/98
- It is "our" information the state is
just our repository. Charles J.
Hughes 2/21/98
- Recovered costs should not include overhead or
initial investment costs Donald P.
Butler 2/21/98
- The mechanism to charge and collect the fees
should also be
considered as overhead and not a recoverable cost. Charles Matz
3/4/98
- You should pay us! M. Taylor
2/21/98
- They have to provide it if I go up the counter
and request it R. K. (Kris) Weaver
2/22/98
- There is a common law and First Amendment
right of access to court records, abundantly
established in the case law. Michael
Jung 2/27/98
- Where the request is for information that
should be made generally accessible to the
public, the State should not charge
David A. Schulman 2/27/98
- I thought the point of the web page was to
reduce the number of calls to the clerk's
office JULIA F. PENDERY 2/27/98
- The basic tenet . . . is that a person does
not come "like a serf" hat in hand,
seeking permission of the lord to haveaccess to
public records. Access to public records is a matter of right. Ohio Court of
Appeals, 3/4/98
- The public pays enough for taxes, that pay
salaries and buy equipment as it is.
Alice 3/8/98
- Should users be charged for Internet access to
Court data JCIT 2/21/98
- Court should be run for the benefit of the
public, and not for the protection of private
information publishers. JimJohnson
2/21/98
- Public needs a public resource they can use to
level the playing field a bit. Craig
Ball 2/21/98
- Government information should be free to the
public K.Slaydon 2/21/98
- The state should not be in the business of
"selling" public information
Joe Edwards 2/21/98
- If I had to pay, I'd probably just call the
clerk Dennis L. Roossien 2/21/98
- Re: If I had to pay, I'd probably just call
the clerk
Jeff Lane 8/9/98
- Why should people from out of town be charged
for information available without imposition of
any additional incremental effort
Tony Petrocchi 2/23/98
- If I can get the information with a short walk
to the courthouse or a
local call, why shouldn't the lawyer in Gilmer be able to get the
same thing - FOR FREE -
just like me - with just as little effort Robert Barbee
2/23/98
- Preferably nothing, but a yearly subscription
fee is more reasonable than per page.
Deidre M. Waters 2/21/98
- 5th Court's website has reduced by 90% my
calls to the court staff. Paul
Koning 2/21/98
- If there is a charge, why should I use the
internet instead of Westlaw Ruth
Malinas 2/21/98
- It offends me anytime a State agency charges
for information Martin L. Kahn
2/21/98
- Per minute charges could quickly become
outrageous Catherine Magruder
2/21/98
- If I'm representing an indigent it will be
charged back to the county regardless
R. K. (Kris) Weaver 2/22/98
- Charging for furnishing the information via
computer would be like a toll (at the
courthouse door) Stewart Ransom Miller
2/22/98
- Costs will be small compared to the costs of
responding to telephonic and personal inquiries
to deputy clerks. Michael Jung
2/27/98
- Providing the information to a thousand users
costs almost nothing more than to provide it to
one David A. Schulman 2/27/98
- We'll just call the clerk or come to the
clerk's office Julia Pendery, Cowles
and Thompson 2/27/98
- "(not only to TAX) but 'TO BIND us in ALL
CASES WHATSOEVER' " Thomas
Paine, "The American Crisis", December
1776
- Every citizen is presumed to know the law thus
declared, and it needs no argument to show that
justice requires that all should have free
access to the opinions...
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court - 1886 4/2/99
- Should public and litigants be charged less
than attorneys and businesses JCIT 2/21/98
- Litigants should be able to access their own
information for free. Catherine
Magruder 2/21/98
- Will it be on an honor system?
Craig Ball 2/21/98
- Attorneys and businesses are members of the
"public," too. Michael
Jung 2/27/98
- What case level information should be made
available JCIT 2/21/98
- Everything Martin L. Kahn 2/21/98
- Make everything available, from the higest
court to the lowest Deirdre M.
Waters 2/21/98
- What court services and information should be
provided over the internet JCIT 2/21/98
- Everything that one could get from a trip to
the courthouse Marc R. Stanley
2/21/98
- Electronic filing Tony Petrocchi
2/23/98
- Electronic filing has been authorized by
statute for many years Michael Jung
2/27/98
- Other Comments Charles Matz 2/22/98
- I love the convenience of getting court of
appeals information by internet. R.
K. (Kris) Weaver 2/22/98
- Examine the secret agenda of those who would
closed the courts to public scrutiny
Stewart Ransom Miller 2/22/98
- Having access is very helpful and cost
efficient RICHARD E. YOUNG 2/22/98
- A vote for public access Homero C.
Canales 2/22/98
- I think if it is public record it should be
made public. Maggie Mushitz-Compton
2/22/98
- State employees (including elected officials)
work for the public, but very few of them seem
willing to accept or acknowledge that fact
Susan Taylor 2/22/98
- The Internet is the greatest tool for the
equalization of information since the printing
press Patrick T. Mulry 2/22/98
- Keep the free in freedom! Craig
Ball 2/22/98
- The Dallas Court of Appeals Website is by far
the best judicial website in Texas. In fact it
is the best one I have ever seen.
Paul Koning 2/22/98
- Maintaining obstacles to obtaining information
only ensures that those who cannot afford an
attorney will remain in the dark.
Brian Casey 2/22/98
- Thanks to all the people responsible for this
great site. Janet R. Randle 2/22/98
- The site is AWESOME ! P. Michael
Jung 2/22/98
- This website is an outstanding model for other
Courts of Appeals to follow Carlos
Mattioli 2/22/98
- Your court web site is quite impressive.
Erika Wayne, Law Librarian, Stanford Law School
2/22/98
- The judiciary serves two distinct purposes
Hank Voegtle 2/22/98
- The Senate Interim Committee on Public
Information is the best hope for preserving
free access to court info on-line
Walt Borges -- director of Texas Citizen
Action's Court Watch 2/26/98
- Having access on the Internet to information
is invaluable LaDawn Conway 2/27/98
- It's high time for the Courts to get on the
Net - give the public an opportunity to see and
study what for too long has beeninaccessible
Paula Sweeney 2/27/98
- You still have the best judicial site in the
nation. Judge Mike O'Neil 4/24/98
- Charging fees for access to court information
will have the effect of keeping the public
uninformed and ignorant -- not a worthy goal of
a free society. Let the light of knowledge
shine so the truth may be illuminated. Bill
Beard 5/23/98
- I wish I had known about the email (eNotes!)
update capability earlier, it would have saved
me calling the clerk *MANY* times
John Horany 6/13/98
- Thank You So Much! Robert D. Barbee
3/31/99
- What a fabulous site Matt Muller
4/2/99
- This an amazing website. Deborah
Claudio 4/15/99
- AWESOME site!!! Kelly H Kolb
5/31/99
- Your site is one of the best court sites I
have ever seen. Jonathan Hughes
5/31/99
Last changed: July 20, 2006